<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Feed: Digital Fourth </title>
	<atom:link href="http://warrantless.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warrantless.org</link>
	<description>The Massachusetts campaign to protect digital data from warrantless government surveillance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>#MassOps Fusion Center Protest Rally: BRIC, Boston, June 1, 2:30pm</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fusion-center-rally/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fusion-center-rally</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fusion-center-rally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#MassOps, supported by the Defend the Fourth Coalition and Digital Fourth, are putting together a protest rally at the Boston Regional Intelligence Center. This is located at the headquarters of Boston PD, at One Schroeder Plaza, Roxbury, MA 02120. The rally is at 2:30pm, and there&#8217;s a pub crawl starting around 6:00-6:30pm. For background on fusion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fusion-center-rally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Warrantless DNA Swabs of Arrestees Violate The Constitution</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/dna/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dna</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/dna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court is considering the case Maryland v. King (thanks to Jennifer Wagner at Genomics Law Report for an excellent and detailed analysis), which turns on whether law enforcement needs a warrant to take the DNA of someone arrested and charged with, but not yet convicted of a crime. Maryland AG Douglas Gansler has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/dna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By 2020, Commercial Vendors Will Offer Quantum Encryption</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/quantum-encryption/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quantum-encryption</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/quantum-encryption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los alamos national laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy concerns of 2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the major problems with challenging the surveillance state is that it is extremely difficult to prove legally that you have been under surveillance. The only people able to prove it are the government themselves, or (in highly unusual cases) people to whom the government has accidentally disclosed that they are under surveillance. What [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/quantum-encryption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drawing The Line On Drones: Maine, Massachusetts legislators ponder when drones can be used without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/maine-drone-warrants/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maine-drone-warrants</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/maine-drone-warrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense of liberty pac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Thistle at the Bangor Daily News reports that the Maine Senate is now considering a bill regulating the use of drones. The bill is the result of consultations including legislators of both parties, the ACLU of Maine, and the Defense of Liberty PAC. It imposes a one-year moratorium on the use of drones by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/maine-drone-warrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI-Borg Informs US Private Sector of its Impending Assimilation, Generously Limits Fines for Resistance to $25,000 Per Day Per Violation</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fbi-borg-strikes-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fbi-borg-strikes-again</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fbi-borg-strikes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy concerns of 2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stasi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI has a new proposal afoot to require communications companies doing business in the US to make their communications technologies &#8220;wiretap-ready&#8221;, to avoid the &#8220;going-dark problem&#8221;. From Charlie Savage at the New York Times, six hours ago: The Obama administration, resolving years of internal debate, is on the verge of backing a Federal Bureau of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/fbi-borg-strikes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ace G-Man Knows All: FBI Agent Claims Power to Access Content of All Phone Calls Ever</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/ace-g-man-knows-all/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ace-g-man-knows-all</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/ace-g-man-knows-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 14:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article xiv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spousal privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamerlan tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim clemente]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizen! Were you under the misapprehension that the terrorist-sympathizing Supreme Court had ruled long ago that law enforcement had to get an actual warrant before accessing the content of your phone calls? Has that thought been keeping you up at night, because it allows people to express potentially un-American thoughts without the FBI being able [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/05/ace-g-man-knows-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Information Asymmetry</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/total-information-asymmetry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=total-information-asymmetry</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/total-information-asymmetry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the ever-brilliant Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/total-information-asymmetry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drowning in Data, Starved for Wisdom: The surveillance state cannot meaningfully assess terrorism risks</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/drowning_in_data/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=drowning_in_data</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/drowning_in_data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Valdez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic wiretaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcriminalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamarlen tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NSA has just vigorously denied that their new Utah Data Center, intended for storing and processing intelligence data, will be used to spy on US citizens. The center will have a capacity of at least one yottabyte, and will provide employment for 100-200 people. With the most generous assumptions [200 employees, all employed only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/drowning_in_data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panel Discussion on Privacy and Security, BU, April 24</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/bu-panel/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bu-panel</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/bu-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic wiretaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop and frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are in the BU area on Wednesday evening, come by to hear interesting speakers talking about privacy and security in the wake of the Boston Marathon attacks. Panelists will include Alex Marthews (that&#8217;s me!), James O&#8217;Keefe of the Massachusetts Pirate Party, and Gregg Housh. RSVP here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/bu-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Liberties Commentary on the Boston Marathon Manhunt</title>
		<link>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/commentar/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=commentar</link>
		<comments>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/commentar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orin kerr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popehat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volokh conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrantless.org/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A variety of excellent commentary over the weekend reflected on the civil liberties implications of the Boston Marathon attacks. Over at Salon, Falguni Sheth and Robert Prasch used a thought experiment (What would have been different if the bombing had happened in 1977, before mass electronic surveillance?) to argue that the vast expenditure on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://warrantless.org/2013/04/commentar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
